Page 74 - 2021-Yillik-Rapor-Ingilizce
P. 74

THE OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TÜRKİYE



                 pandemic, the transfer conditions are met, recommendations are made to the Ministry
                 of Justice to re-evaluate the transfer requests by the administration in case there is
                 availability in the institution or have sufficient capacity
                 PROTECTION OF FAMILY

                 After the workshop on "Preventing Violations of Rights in Child Handover", which is
                 among the activities in 2018, OI prepared a "Special Report on Violations of Rights
                 in Child Handover and Poverty Alimony" in 2019, harmonizing the current practice
                 in our country with national and international legislation and preventing violations
                 of rights. In addition to the recommendations made by Ombudsman Institution
                 previously, steps that can be taken were discussed.
                 SCIENCE, ART, CULTURE AND TOURISM

                 Case Summary

                 In the relevant application made to our institution, the project application made for
                 the second time within the scope of the 1002 Rapid Support Program, the panelists
                 who evaluated the project did not read the project fully, so given a lower score on the
                 grounds that there were no statements that actually existed in the project, and that the
                 details of some parameters that they did not undertake to do were not written and their
                 projects were not supported, in addition, in the appeal application made to TUBIMER,
                 in response to project criticisms, although they show that the project details which are
                 the subject of criticism, are on the relevant pages of the project text, on the grounds
                 that the issues stated in the objection do not eliminate the project rejection grounds,
                 complaints about the issues that were decided to be rejected and by examining the
                 evaluation method of TUBITAK panelists and the evaluation made by TUBIMER, it
                 was requested that the project in question to be evaluated by the experts in the field.

                 As a result of the examination carried out by our Institution; the evaluation process
                 of the project proposal of the applicant and the handling of the objection made after
                 the application and the evaluation process were carried out in accordance with the
                 procedure, it cannot be said that there is no objective evaluation, evaluations are based
                 on scientific grounds, the decisions taken are presented with justifications and more
                 importantly as it is understood that it is possible to resubmit the project proposal
                 by making the necessary changes and corrections within the framework of the issues
                 specified in the Scientific Evaluation Report conveyed to the applicant regarding the
                 said project proposal, on the grounds that the applicant's objection application is
                 not capable of eliminating the grounds for rejection in the project decision letter in
                 accordance with the fifth paragraph of Article 14 of the relevant Regulation, it was
                 rejected by the TÜBİTAK Objection Evaluation Board, and a Decision of Rejection
                 was given on the grounds that there was no violation of law and equity.






              70 2021 ANNUAL REPORT
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79