Page 101 - 2022-ingilizce-Yillik-Rapor-baski-son
P. 101

THE OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TÜRKİYE



                 of ethical violation on the grounds that he made a false and misleading statement. He
                 stated that there was no violation of the legislation regarding the inclusion of the work
                 in question in his application file for 2022 March term in the field of Econometrics.
                 Thus, the complainant claimed he added the study in question to the application file
                 since there was no legal obstacle in presenting the study in the associate professorship
                 application he made in March 2022. He argued that the decision made by the Associate
                 Professorship commission for 2022 March term was not a lawful decision. He pointed
                 out that even if the study in question was not counted in the associate professorship
                 application file, the total score of the studies he carried out was far above the minimum
                 requirement of 100 points required for the application to associate professorship. He
                 added that if the associate professorship committee deems it appropriate, they could
                 disregard this study and remove it from the application file. The complainant requested
                 a re-examination of the associate professorship application file, claiming that although
                 the  same  work  was  included  in  the  application  for  associate  professorship  he  made
                 in the previous term, the work in question did not prevent the application, and he
                 requested that the unfair decision given by the Associate Professorship Commission be
                 reviewed and corrected. During the investigation-examination phase initiated by the
                 Ombudsman Institution, the Institution requested information and documents from
                 the Turkish Interuniversity Board, as the relevant administration. In its response letter,
                 the Office of the Secretary General of the Interuniversity Board Presidency reported
                 that the issues mentioned by the applicant were discussed at the Associate Professorship
                 Committee meeting on 16.06.2022, and his request was accepted, and the process
                 would continue from where it left off. In this context, since it was understood that the
                 request in the complaint application was fulfilled by the relevant administration, the
                 application was concluded with an Amicable Settlement Decision. 7

                 7.4    RIGHT TO WORK AND SOCIAL SECURITY

                 It is observed that the applications lodged to the Ombudsman Institution regarding
                 social security rights and practices are concentrated on issues such as granting a
                 retirement pension, death benefit, or invalidity pension, payment of retirement bonus,
                 other retirement transactions, inclusion  of service abroad in insurance matters, merging
                 of service periods subject to various social security institutions, auditing activities of
                 the Social Security Institution, general health insurance, improper and overpayments,
                 insurance periods, and premium refunds.
                 CASE SUMMARY

                 The applicant stated that he paid voluntary insurance premiums for the period between
                 December 1994 and December 1997 within the scope of Social Insurance Law No.

                 7    Amicable Settlement Decision dated 05.08.2022 on application numbered 2022/8422


             100 2022 ANNUAL REPORT
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106