Page 96 - On-merged
P. 96

THE OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TÜRKİYE



               Case Summaries

               About the Removal of Age Limit, a Barrier in Issuing a Student Commutation Card
               in Public Transport
               The applicant stated that although there was no age limit in the Law no. 2547 on
               Higher Education and other relative regulations for being a student,  Bursa Metropolitan
               Municipality placed a restriction on age with  its Implementing Regulation of
               Commutation Tickets in Public Transport Vehicles and that he was a Ph.D. student in
               Dokuz Eylül University, who was born in 1981 and a student commutation card was
               not issued for his party due to the aforementioned regulation of Bursa Metropolitan
               Municipality.  The  applicant  expressed  that  placing  an  age  restriction  on  student
               commutation cards was unlawful, that in Ankara Metropolitan Municipality, such an
               age-relevant requirement was not sought for low rate student commutation cards and
               the same went for İzmir considering the By-Law on Customised Commutation Cards
               of İzmir Metropolitan  Municipality, and  requested the annulment of the age limit
               in issuing student commutation cards set forth in the Implementing Regulation of
               Commutation Tickets in Public Transport Vehicles of Bursa Metropolitan Municipality.

               As a result of the examination and investigation conducted, it was evaluated that  the
               definition of “student” differed according to municipalities and in general there was
               not an age limit for higher education students; in addition, the administration had
               discretionary powers in determining the criteria for applying reductions; however, these
               powers were not limitless neither absolute and should be used  in line with the public
               service requirements and for public interest; in this concrete event, “30 years” limit
               was placed for Ph.D. students  by the administration. In the letter submitted to our
               Institution as a response, the administration did not justify the grounds for exercising its
               discretionary power although the exercise of the discretionary power must be justifiable
               and it was evaluated that the implementation of age criterium by the administration
               was not in accordance with the public service requirements.

                                                                   20
               Within this scope, it was concluded that a Recommendation   should be submitted to
               Bursa Metropolitan Municipality about taking relative actions to remove the age limit in
               the definition of student laid down in the Implementing Regulation of Commutation
               Tickets in Public Transport Vehicles of Bursa Metropolitan Municipality.

               About the Request for Taking Necessary Measures for Stray Dogs

               The applicants requested taking necessary measures for dangerous stray dogs, collection
               and transfer of stray dogs to animal shelters by competent authorities, and killing the
               dogs that pose a threat to human life if deemed necessary and drafting legislation that
               would allow the streets to be cleared of stray dogs in a similar way to the practices in
               modern countries



               20   Recommendation dated 06/09/2019 on the application no. 2019/6610

                                                                      2019 ANNUAL REPORT  95
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101