Page 61 - 2018-yillik-raporu-ing
P. 61

THE OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TÜRKİYE 2018 ANNUAL REPORT




            A case summary

            In the application filed on behalf of 870 applicants, applicants complained about the curfew
            declared by the district governorate in Silopi, Şırnak between 5-24 April 2016 and stated that
            they failed the Entrance to High School Exam (TEOG) which was held on 27-28 April 2016
            claiming that they weren’t provided with public services sufficiently and couldn’t meet their
            humanitarian needs, that the administration didn’t take necessary and adequate measures to
            continue public services, and that the security measures weren’t executed as required. Thus,
            the applicant asked for compensation with an amount of 10 thousand Turkish Liras for each
            applicant.

            Our Institution conducted examinations to find if there were any acts or actions of the
            district governorate which were contrary to the law. So, whether the curfew decision was
            necessary or not, whether the public services were provided sufficiently or not, whether the
            right to education was violated or not, whether the applicants failed the exam because of
            the shortcoming of the administration, and whether the administration took necessary and
            adequate measures for the continuation of the public services or not were thoroughly looked
            into by our Institution. As a result, it was concluded that the curfew decision was declared
            on legal grounds in Silopi, which is located in a sensitive region where there are continuously
            armed conflicts with terrorist organizations, that curfew decision was declared to protect the
            safety and property of the citizens, that necessary measures were taken to make up for the
            interruption because of the curfew and that compensation courses for students were provided,
            students’ failure in the exam was not related to the curfew as the factors for failure were based
            on many different reasons some of which might be subjective, and therefore our Institution
            issued refusal decision.

               f) Economy, Finance and Tax
            Most of the applications in this field have been about the following matters:

               ◊  Banking Transactions,
               ◊  Insurance Transactions,

               ◊  Capital Markets,
               ◊  Tender Procedures,
               ◊  Public Receivables and Debts,

               ◊  Tax Procedures,
               ◊  Financial Offenses and Trafficking and

               ◊  Other matters relating to Economy, Finance and Tax.






                                                                                             59
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66