Page 34 - KDK
P. 34

Constitutional  Court  and  the  Supreme  Court:  the  High  Commissioner
              gives opinions on specific legal issues at the request of judges, tables
              motions  to  reconsider  court  decisions  and  participates  in  elaborating
              recommendations on important matters of judicial practice.
              In  a  number  of  member  States,  Ombudsman  institutions  have  been
              empowered to intervene in relevant court proceedings through amicus
              curiae in order to provide expert analysis and guidance on human rights
              issues.  The  Moldovan  Council  for  Prevention  and  Combatting
              Discrimination and Ensuring Equality, for instance, is entitled to provide
              amicus curiae to domestic courts in cases of relevance to its mandate as
              is expressly provided for in article 74 of the Civil Procedural Code. A guide
              on how to write an amicus curiae developed with the assistance of the
              Council  of  Europe  has  further  enhanced  its  capacity  to  deliver
              professional  inputs  before  national  courts.  In  Georgia,  the  Public
              Defender  also  performs  the  function  of  a  friend  of  the  court  in  the
              Commons Courts and the Constitutional Court.

              The  Human  Rights  Defender of  Armenia  has  the  right  to  apply  to the
              Constitutional Court regarding the conformity of the provisions of laws,
              decisions  of  the  National  Assembly,  orders  and  instructions  of  the
              President, decisions of the Government and the Prime Minister and by-
              laws with the provisions of Chapter 2 of the Constitution on Basic Rights
              and Freedoms of the Human Beings and the Citizen. The Human Rights
              Defender’s Office publishes reports on all amicus briefs submitted to the
              Constitutional Court.

              Making recommendations and proposing administrative or
              legislative reforms

              Principle 8(c)
              Ombudsman institutions generally have wide powers to recommend that
              State bodies remedy particular problems faced by citizens, as well as
              reform systems to ensure that problems do not recur, and administration
              is  improved.  In  Portugal,  for  example,  the  Ombudsman’s  legislation
              empowers  him  or  her  to  make  recommendations  in  order  to:  address
              illegal or unfair acts of State bodies; help improve public services; point
              out shortcomings in legislation; and advise on how legislation should be
              interpreted.  Similarly,  in  Malta,  the  Ombudsman’s  legislation  provides
              that  the  Ombudsman  may  make  recommendations  in  a  range  of
              situations, including where he or she is of the opinion that: the matter
              needs to be referred to an appropriate authority for further consideration;
              an omission should be rectified; a decision cancelled or varied; a practice

                                                33
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39